Google

Monday, May 24, 2010

Peak Kidd 2

A Frame Ahead


Two years ago,Jason Kidd was traded from the New Jersey Nets to the Dallas Mavericks.Too old and declining skills they said.Fast forward to 2010 and Jason continues to be one of the top point guards in the NBA.Despite his age,he continues to play at a high level averaging 10.1 points,6.6 rebounds,9.2 assists and 2.0 steals per game while shooting 42% from three point range and 80% from the free throw line.Top it off with his 10th all star appearance.Not only did Jason change teams but he also changed shoe brands last year from Nike to Peak.Last season's Peak Kidd 1 was a decent start.While it had it's flaws,it still performed well enough to say that any drop off in Jason's performance shouldn't be attributed to his change in shoe companies.This season we get the Peak Kidd 2 that boasts some major improvements resolving some of the major issues of the Peak Kidd 1.With the Peak Kidd 2, extra attention was made to increase the breathability of the shoe as well as improving the traction.Lets see if the shoe really proves age ain't nothing but a number or if it will make you a grumpy old man.

figure1
note the slight curve to the forefoot

The Peak Kidd 2 feels a bit lighter than the Kidd 1.The materials used in the construction of the shoe felt like better quality than the Kidd 1.The asymmetrical collar comes back for great support without sacrificing range of motion.The collar is well padded with a softer material compared to the Kidd 1 and the lining did not bleed onto my socks like it's predecessor.The placement of the padding also keeps the heel locked down,where the padding is thickest between the ankle bone to really fill in the space between the ankle bone and heel to keep the foot in place.The breathability issue was addressed with mesh vents throughout the medial side of the shoe.The improvement in breathability was noticeable and kept my foot comfortable.Peak should probably consider changing the way the shoes are laced out of the box.Using an over-under method does not allow the wearer to really tighten the shoe to provide a snug fit.Changing to a more standard under-over lacing will allow the wearer to tighten as needed.

figure2
note the dark blue TPU shank that wraps under the heel

Peak designers did a good job lowering the profile of the Kidd 2 versus the Kidd 1.The Kidd 2 actually uses the same insole that gave me problems on the Kidd 1 but due with the reduced midsole,I didn't experience the same issues of excessive softness.Peak continues to tweak and evolve PK Rocket.On the Kidd 2, along with the lowered profile,the designers added a TPU shank to the heel that adds stability and helps disperse the force of impact evenly.I enjoyed the added stability and impact protection was again excellent.My only complaint is the again with the softer midsole comes extra weight and less court feel.I would like to see designers continue to move forward and find a way to add a lower profile overall feel without sacrificing the excellent impact protection.

figure3
note the combination herringbone pattern on the heel and forefoot for excellent traction when changing direction and translucent rubber inserts for additional traction.

The Kidd 2 also improved in traction versus it's predecessor.The entire outsole now features either multi-directional herringbone pattern or concentric triangles for plenty of surface area to eat up dirt and really grip all court surfaces.Again a soft rubber compound is used to add to the already excellent traction.The overall feel of the shoe is very stable.An internal TPU midfoot shank adds midfoot stability and when coupled with the TPU shank in the heel makes for a really stable ride.A semi curved last also makes for great heel to toe transition.

figure4
again note the semi curved outsole

I was impressed by the Peak Kidd 2.I liked that the shoe had an overall lower profile feel and the TPU shank in the heel to disperse the impact was great.Traction was excellent and designers addressed the lack of breathablity.Although lighter thank the Kidd 1,the shoe could be lighter with some tweaks to the midsole and compounds used.

Comfort and Fit-4/5
Cushioning-3.5/5
Ankle Support-3.5/5
Traction-4/5
Overall-4/5

Cushioning was great and while it provided excellent impact protection,the lack of rebound effect especially in the forefoot when cutting or pushing off in changes of direction made the difference.The comfort and fit of the shoe was improved but Peak would probably do better by changing the way the shoes are laced.The way the shoes are laced straight out of the box do not allow the wearer to really tighten the shoe and make for a snug fit.Overall the difference between the Kidd 1 and Kidd 2 is leaps and bounds.As Jason Kidd seems to be getting better with age,so too hopefully is mirrored by the Peak Kidd line.